#38091: alpine @2.00_4: update to 2.11 -----------------------+---------------------- Reporter: larryv@… | Owner: john@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: alpine | -----------------------+---------------------- Comment (by larryv@…): It looks like you’re using the [http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/info/all.html fully-patched source] instead of the [http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/release unpatched source]. This is not workable because the distfile name does not change with the patchlevel. If upstream changes the patchlevel, users will start seeing checksum mismatches. If we use the [http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/release/src/alpine-2.20.tar.xz unpatched release], could we still remove all of our patches? Would your portfile patch still be valid (checksums aside)? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38091#comment:33> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X