#43876: Request to update port 'whizard' -------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: juergen.reuter@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: whizard | -------------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by juergen.reuter@…): Oops, this was a cut-and-paste typo with the 4.7/8/9 versions of gcc. Concerning, the gcc45 and gcc46 variants, they have to vanish from the portfile, as our code is no longer maintained for these legacy versions of gcc and does not compile with them. We demand gcc >= 4.7.1 for our code. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43876#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#43876: Request to update port 'whizard' -------------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: juergen.reuter@… | Owner: whizard@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: whizard | -------------------------------+----------------------- Comment (by juergen.reuter@…): Ok, sorry about the confusion. whizard@mail.desy.de (or shorter whizard@desy.de) is a functional email account maintained by myself (Juergen Reuter) that is also forwarded to the rest of the WHIZARD team members. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43876#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#43876: Request to update port 'whizard' -------------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: juergen.reuter@… | Owner: whizard@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: whizard | -------------------------------+----------------------- Comment (by juergen.reuter@…): Replying to [comment:6 mf2k@…]:

That is confusing and we committers have no way to really know that. I think we need to at least add your email address to the list of maintainers so that when you submit patches, we aren't waiting a period time for approval that will never come. If a known maintainer attaches a valid patch, it can be applied immediately.

Fair enough. Could you add this right away, or do I have to provide a new patch file!? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43876#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#43876: Request to update port 'whizard' -------------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: juergen.reuter@… | Owner: whizard@… Type: update | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: haspatch Port: whizard | -------------------------------+----------------------- Changes (by mf2k@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: r120645 -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43876#comment:9> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X