#20315: digikam-0.10.0 new port submission ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: rechner@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1 Keywords: | Port: digikam ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Description changed by macsforever2000@…: Old description:

In February this year I already created a Portfile for digikam and sent it to the [http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports- users/2009-February/013816.html macports users list]. But no one picked it up, and included it in the repositories. So now I try it via trac, the proper way.

During the LONG process of building all dependencies (on my good old G4) I stumbled upon two problems, one in [https://trac.macports.org/ticket/20313 kdegraphics4 (on a case-sensitive file-system)] and one in [https://trac.macports.org/ticket/20314 qca].

First I tried to use digiKam 1.0 beta 2, and even succeeded installing it, but it keeps crashing, so it might be to early for a ticket?

I'm not sure if this version needs kdegraphics4 at all, but digikam 1.0 definitely needs it, so the dependency might as well stay in here already.

New description: In February this year I already created a Portfile for digikam and sent it to the [http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports- users/2009-February/013816.html macports users list]. But no one picked it up, and included it in the repositories. So now I try it via trac, the proper way. During the LONG process of building all dependencies (on my good old G4) I stumbled upon two problems, one in kdegraphics4 (on a case-sensitive file- system) (#20313) and one in qca (#20314). First I tried to use digiKam 1.0 beta 2, and even succeeded installing it, but it keeps crashing, so it might be to early for a ticket? I'm not sure if this version needs kdegraphics4 at all, but digikam 1.0 definitely needs it, so the dependency might as well stay in here already. -- -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20315#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#20315: digikam-0.10.0 new port submission ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: rechner@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1 Keywords: | Port: digikam ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Old description:

In February this year I already created a Portfile for digikam and sent it to the [http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports- users/2009-February/013816.html macports users list]. But no one picked it up, and included it in the repositories. So now I try it via trac, the proper way.

During the LONG process of building all dependencies (on my good old G4) I stumbled upon two problems, one in kdegraphics4 (on a case-sensitive file-system) (#20313) and one in qca (#20314).

First I tried to use digiKam 1.0 beta 2, and even succeeded installing it, but it keeps crashing, so it might be to early for a ticket?

I'm not sure if this version needs kdegraphics4 at all, but digikam 1.0 definitely needs it, so the dependency might as well stay in here already.

New description: In February this year I already created a Portfile for digikam and sent it to the [http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports- users/2009-February/013816.html macports users list]. But no one picked it up, and included it in the repositories. So now I try it via trac, the proper way. During the LONG process of building all dependencies (on my good old G4) I stumbled upon two problems, one in kdegraphics4 (on a case-sensitive file- system) (#20313) and one in qca (#20314). First I tried to use digiKam 1.0 beta 2, and even succeeded installing it, but it keeps crashing, so it might be too early for a ticket? I'm not sure if this version needs kdegraphics4 at all, but digikam 1.0 definitely needs it, so the dependency might as well stay in here already. -- Comment(by macsforever2000@…): Replying to [comment:2 rechner@…]:

Typo: In the line on digiKam 1.0 it has to be "too early", not "to early".

Fixed. :) A couple of notes about your portfile submission: - The "{{{revision 0}}}" line is unnecessary and should be removed. - In the {{{long_description}}} line, the word "applications" should be "application". - The {{{distname}}} line is redundant and should be removed since that is the default. - I do not understand this line: "{{{configure.args-append ../${distname}}}}". Does it really need that to configure? - Are you willing to be the maintainer for this port? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20315#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#20315: digikam-0.10.0 new port submission ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: rechner@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1 Keywords: | Port: digikam ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by macsforever2000@…): Replying to [comment:4 rechner@…]:

Sorry, I don't understand how to change my ticket. In the help it says "All tickets can be edited, annotated, assigned, prioritized and discussed at any time." - but how?

You can update an attachment by uploading a file with the same name and checking "Replace existing attachment of the same name". You can add comments of course, but only macports team members can edit a ticket.

...

- The "{{{revision 0}}}" line is unnecessary and should be removed.

Ok, if you say so. I just used the kdegraphics4 port as a basis, if I recall correctly, and adapted it to digikam's needs.

FYI, there is no revision line in the kdegraphics4 portfile.

...

- In the {{{long_description}}} line, the word "applications" should be "application".

Maybe the whole description should be different. I don't think I made the previous line up, but I don't remember where it is from. Maybe it is "applications" (plural) because "showfoto" is included in the package? I like the [http://packages.debian.org/en/sid/digikam Debian package description] better. Based on that I propose:

"Digital photo management program to import, organize, enhance, search and export your digital images."

Sounds good.

...

- I do not understand this line: "{{{configure.args-append ../${distname}}}}". Does it really need that to configure?

I also don't understand it, but configure fails without this line, so I guess it is necessary (kdegraphics4 also has it).

OK. I've just never seen that before. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20315#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#20315: digikam-0.10.0 new port submission ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: rechner@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1 Keywords: | Port: digikam ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by macsforever2000@…): I'm trying to install it, but I'm hung up on a dependency - kdebase4-runtime (#20362). -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20315#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#20315: digikam-0.10.0 new port submission ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: rechner@… | Owner: macsforever2000@… Type: submission | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1 Keywords: | Port: digikam ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Changes (by macsforever2000@…): * owner: macports-tickets@… => macsforever2000@… * status: new => assigned -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20315#comment:10> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS