[MacPorts] #41658: Add gcc48 to metis portfile
#41658: Add gcc48 to metis portfile ----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: sylvain.desroziers@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Keywords: | Port: metis ----------------------------------+-------------------------------- This patch adds the variant gcc48 to the metis port -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41658> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#41658: metis: Add gcc48 variant -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: sylvain.desroziers@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: metis | -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * keywords: => haspatch Comment: Why would we want to add this? We don't usually add variants for random compilers. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41658#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#41658: metis: Add gcc48 variant -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: sylvain.desroziers@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: metis | -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by sean@…): Replying to [comment:1 ryandesign@…]:
Why would we want to add this? We don't usually add variants for random compilers.
Being that metis is used in a lot of scientific codes, it is very valuable for having different compilers as variants (I did this as well with my "science ports"). Though, looking at the metis file, it seems all kinds of wrong having an openmpi variant (parmetis is the parallel version). I would like to unify all of these types of compilers but have been busy with other things :-/ I'll try to dig out some time to work on this. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41658#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#41658: metis: Add gcc48 variant -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: sylvain.desroziers@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: metis | -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by sylvain.desroziers@…): gcc48 is most recent stable compiler from gnu. I develop scientific code under MacOS and I need great portability. I know my patch isn't sufficient and could be improve for all gcc version provided by macport. For information, scientifics (around me) developping under MacOS always compile themselves scientific librairies and don't really use macports as they should. Using gcc48 is a strong requirement. But I understand the complexity to provide ports tuned for several compilers... Thanks for your answer. It's maybe a non-usefull contribution but I share it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41658#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#41658: metis: Add gcc48 variant -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: sylvain.desroziers@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: haspatch Port: metis | -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Changes (by sean@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Fixed in r116385. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41658#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
participants (1)
-
MacPorts