#24439: Update arm-rtems-binutils and arm-rtems-gcc -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: jm.gomez@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch | Port: arm-rtems-binutils arm-rtems-gcc -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Changes (by mk@…): * cc: mk@… (added) Comment: I had a little trouble with the last chunk for arm-rtems-binutils, but that was easily fixable. Why are the checksums uncommented for arm-rtems- binutils? When I try to use the patch for arm-rtems-gcc I get this: {{{ patching file Portfile Hunk #5 FAILED at 97. Hunk #6 succeeded at 129 (offset 5 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 266. 2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Portfile.rej }}} I didn't do a further analysis, since livecheck shows for both ports much newer version by now. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/24439#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#24439: Update arm-rtems-binutils and arm-rtems-gcc -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: jm.gomez@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch | Port: arm-rtems-binutils arm-rtems-gcc -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Comment(by mk@…): Yes, of course. :-) -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/24439#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS