#51222: nfft-3 @3.3.1 Update Portfile for new release. -------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: macports@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: nfft-3 | -------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by macports@…): The Portfile now also specifies the (optional) test phase which will run the provided unit tests. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51222#comment:1> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#51222: nfft-3 @3.3.1 Update Portfile for new release. -------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: macports@… | Owner: jens@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: nfft-3 | -------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by macports@…): Thanks for the information. I am the maintainer of this port, though I'm using a different email address in this ticketing system. Here's the diff output when comparing to the current version: {{{ 8c8 < version 3.3.0 ---

version 3.3.1 39,41c39,41 < master_sites https://www-user.tu- chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/download/ < checksums rmd160 52cac61a90a72bb25a91b3aa0d1b1692d1895e26 \ < sha256 bb844b762896b17b7bf8245511a6372fcef82e55c2552f2f7ee7c65a8d746f30

master_sites https://github.com/NFFT/nfft/releases/download/${version}/ checksums rmd160 08b4ff6b8d35b2ebc90159a8e86ff400e565528c \ sha256 74cc7f4c8922d72131c59f88ecb542e06254eaded09018d6367f8a46c0fb3125 49a50,52 test.run yes test.target check

}}} In essence, the version number has been bumped, the download location has been updated (assets are now provided directly on GitHub), and the optional test target has been added. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51222#comment:3> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#51222: nfft-3 @3.3.1 Update Portfile for new release. -------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: macports@… | Owner: jens@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: nfft-3 | -------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by jens@…): G'day, I have updated the Portfile to use the PortGroup github. I have also changed my user's email address to match the one in the Portfile. The dependency is a bit awkward since I would be forced to create a separate account if a different maintainer email would be used for another port maintained by myself. Best, Jens -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51222#comment:5> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#51222: nfft-3 @3.3.1 Update Portfile for new release. -------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: macports@… | Owner: jens@… Type: update | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: nfft-3 | -------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by dstrubbe@…): Why did you remove the use of the compilers portgroup? There is no mention of that change in this discussion or the resulting commit. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51222#comment:8> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#51222: nfft-3 @3.3.1 Update Portfile for new release. -------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: macports@… | Owner: jens@… Type: update | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: nfft-3 | -------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by dstrubbe@…): Yes it looks like that might have been a mistake. I think it is helpful to use the compilers portgroup, since for scientific/mathematical ports like this, one might wish to try different compilers to find the best performance, so I think it should be re-added. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51222#comment:11> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X