#42677: ROOT : Update to 5.34.17 + Remove X11 dependencies when using Cocoa -----------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: jonesc@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch maintainer Port: root | -----------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by jonesc@…): OK, I'll try and remember but no guarantees ;) I normally just run a diff of my local version against the last released Portfile, from the /<prefix>/etc... area. The long path is not my fault, but MacPorts decision on where it stores the Portfiles... ;) Chris -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42677#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#42677: ROOT : Update to 5.34.17 + Remove X11 dependencies when using Cocoa -----------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: jonesc@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch maintainer Port: root | -----------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by jonesc@…): If it works on OS X 10.7 then yes, please make it the default. *However*, please make sure you test python support. So install with one of the python variants, +python27 say, then from the python prompt verify you can import ROOT and create a TCanvas() properly. i.e. at the prompt {{{

import ROOT ROOT.TCanvas() }}}

If you see a window, it works... This used to be an issue with older ROOT releases when the cocoa variant was enabled, which was primarily why I never made it the default. It works fine on OSX10.9 now (I haven't tested 10.8, I only personally have 10.9, but upstream confirm it works OK as well). This needs to work before I am happy to make it the default on anything older. cheers Chris -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42677#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#42677: ROOT : Update to 5.34.17 + Remove X11 dependencies when using Cocoa -----------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: jonesc@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch maintainer Port: root | -----------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by jonesc@…): Thanks, but wouldn't it have been better to test OSX 10.7 with +cocoa+python *before* committing, then if it is OK updating it to use cocoa by default at the same time ? By committing now, you have triggered a buildbot build of the binaries. If you update svn again to change the OSX10.7 default, that will trigger yet another build (and you will have to update the revision), which seems a little unnecessary to me. Anyway, no major deal, thanks for committing and testing it ;) cheers Chris -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42677#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#42677: ROOT : Update to 5.34.17 + Remove X11 dependencies when using Cocoa -----------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: jonesc@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch maintainer Port: root | -----------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): It would probably be better to wait, but I wasn't sure when I would be back online. Just to comfort you: there is no need to increase the revision and if there is no increase in revision the binaries won't be rebuilt on the buildbot (except for Lion). -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42677#comment:9> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#42677: ROOT : Update to 5.34.17 + Remove X11 dependencies when using Cocoa -----------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: jonesc@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch maintainer Port: root | -----------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): I tested Python now. I do get the window and no errors or warnings. I have no clue how to use it though ;) So based on your instructions I'm going to lower the number. And if I have time, I might even test in on a virtual machine running 10.6. I suggest to ask the upstream to lower that number as well. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42677#comment:11> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#42677: ROOT : Update to 5.34.17 + Remove X11 dependencies when using Cocoa -----------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: jonesc@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: haspatch maintainer Port: root | -----------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by jonesc@…): Replying to [comment:10 mojca@…]:

Also, in order to steal some of your attention ... I would be grateful if you could take a look at CMake whenever you find a tiny bit of free time. I can offer you assistance with it. The sooner we can polish the configuration-related problems, the better.

(I think I have a solution for parallel installation of ROOT 5 and 6 and I think that ROOT 6 is ready enough to start providing a package in MacPorts. I gladly volunteer as a (co)maintainer of ROOT 6, but I wouldn't want to end up with two diverging installations of ROOT 5 and 6 with different maintainers etc.)

Its really just a matter of my finding time... Updating the normal portfle for new releases takes me next to no time, but learning cmake is going to take longer.... Can you remind me though where you host your root5/root6 portfiles for testing ? Are the cmake issues fully resolved though ? I don't want to switch root5 to it unless it has no regressions compared to the 'normal' build ? Could we perhaps consider switching to cmake only for root6, but keep root5 on as it is ? Or do you have an interest in moving root5 to cmake as well ? Chris -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42677#comment:13> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X