[MacPorts] #32439: BrowserLauncher2: checksum mismatch
#32439: BrowserLauncher2: checksum mismatch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.0.3 Keywords: | Port: BrowserLauncher2 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- {{{ $ sudo port install BrowserLauncher2 ---> Computing dependencies for BrowserLauncher2 ---> Fetching archive for BrowserLauncher2 ---> Attempting to fetch BrowserLauncher2-1.3_0+universal.darwin_10.i386-x86_64.tbz2 from http://packages.macports.org/BrowserLauncher2 ---> Fetching BrowserLauncher2 ---> Attempting to fetch BrowserLauncher2.tar.gz from http://browserlaunch2.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/browserlaunch2/BrowserLaunc... ---> Verifying checksum(s) for BrowserLauncher2 Error: Checksum (rmd160) mismatch for BrowserLauncher2.tar.gz Error: Checksum (sha256) mismatch for BrowserLauncher2.tar.gz Error: Target org.macports.checksum returned: Unable to verify file checksums Log for BrowserLauncher2 is at: /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_Users_rschmidt_macports_dports_java_BrowserLauncher2/BrowserLauncher2/main.log Error: Status 1 encountered during processing. To report a bug, see <http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets> }}} By the look of the URL, it's an automatically-generated file, that they might cache for a time, but then throw away, and regenerate later, which will have a different checksum. So a URL like that is unsuitable for a port's master_sites location. It's also an [wiki:PortfileRecipes #unversioned-distfiles unversioned distfile], which should be avoided. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32439> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#32439: BrowserLauncher2: checksum mismatch --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.0.3 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: BrowserLauncher2 | --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Changes (by jmr@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Technically fixed in r87838 by switching to cvs fetching, with all the drawbacks that entails. Is there actually any reason to build this from source though, given that it's just a couple of .jar files? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32439#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
participants (1)
-
MacPorts