paul beard wrote:
Hm, "gimp" is not ambigious. But maybe the ports should be named different. gimp and gimp2 are just too confusing, I think.
[/Users/paul]# port list gimp* gimp @2.4 graphics/gimp gimp-app @2.4.0 aqua/gimp-app gimp-gap @2.2.2 graphics/gimp-gap gimp-jp2 @0.1 graphics/gimp-jp2 gimp-lqr-plugin @0.3.0-6 graphics/gimp-lqr-plugin gimp-print @4.2.7 print/gimp-print gimp-user-manual @0.13 graphics/gimp-user-manual gimp2 @2.4.3 graphics/gimp2
You don't think the first two and the last one are ambiguous?
What I meant was: If the user wants "gimp", he should get gimp. There is no reason to ask the user any questions what he wants to install. In this case, the short description you see by port search does make clear what these port contain. I would go by gimp2, since it sounds newer than gimp. Rainer