18 Feb
2008
18 Feb
'08
3:49 a.m.
On Feb 17, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Esteban Barahona wrote:
That may be the main objective, but why not also support darwin without the propietary parts of Mac OS X? As I understand it, if it runs on Darwin it must run on Mac OS X... but I guess it's CLI-only apps...
Because it's more work (just being at the CLI doesn't mean MacOSX technologies can't easily become dependencies) for pretty much no gain. Darwin as a stand-alone OS is dead and has been dead for enough years now that there's just no point in supporting it. - Jordan