Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>> and BTW many ports will also fail because they just suppose darwin to
>> be mac os x
>
> We still have separate "macosx" and "darwin" platforms don't we?

There are even three: "darwin", a superset of "macosx" and "puredarwin"

Darwin does not automatically include e.g. Carbon and Cocoa frameworks.
So technically those ports are wrong, or at least making assumptions...