On Feb 16, 2008 10:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign@macports.org> wrote:
On Feb 16, 2008, at 22:04, Angela Zhu wrote:

> On Feb 16, 2008 9:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> >> Perhaps gtk-pixbuf is now part of some other part of gnome, and
>> it's
>> >> finding that on your system? Looking at the entire dependency
>> tree of
>> >> lablgtk2, gtk-pixbuf does not seem to be listed.
>> >>
>> >> Wait, I think I got it: I have /opt/local/lib/
>> >> libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.0.1200.4.dylib on my system and it's provided by
>> >> the gtk2 port. I have gtk2 2.12.4 installed. What version do
>> you have
>> >> installed?
>> >
>> > I think I have the same version:
>> > $ port info gtk2
>> > gtk2 2.12.4, x11/gtk2 (Variants: universal, darwin_6, darwin_7,
>> > quartz, x11)
>>
>>
>> "port info gtk2" just tells you that the currently-available version
>> of gtk2 is 2.12.4. It doesn't say anything about what version you
>> have installed. What does "port installed gtk2" say?
>
>
> It says:
> $ port installed gtk2
> The following ports are currently installed:
>   gtk2 @2.10.13_0 (active)
>
> Probably I should also upgrade this?

Yes you should. :) And any other dependencies of lablgtk that are
outdated (shown with "port outdated").


Well, I think now I don't have any dependence problems, but encountered another error:  

------------------------------------------
$ sudo port install lablgtk2
--->  Activating lablgtk2 2.10.0_0
Error: Target org.macports.activate returned: Image error: Another version of this port (lablgtk2 @2.6.0_0) is already active.
Error: Status 1 encountered during processing.
------------------------------------------


--
Regards,
Angela Zhu
------------------------------------------
Dept. of CS, Rice University
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~yz2/
------------------------------------------