more strangeness on port upgrade?
I'm no expert but this looks strange to me: ---> Uninstalling gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Fetching gimp2 ---> Verifying checksum(s) for gimp2 ---> Extracting gimp2 ---> Configuring gimp2 ---> Building gimp2 with target all ---> Staging gimp2 into destroot ---> Packaging tgz archive for gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Installing gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Activating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Cleaning gimp2 ---> Deactivating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Uninstalling gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Fetching gimp2 ---> Verifying checksum(s) for gimp2 ---> Extracting gimp2 ---> Configuring gimp2 ---> Building gimp2 with target all ---> Staging gimp2 into destroot ---> Packaging tgz archive for gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Installing gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Activating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Cleaning gimp2 ---> Deactivating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Uninstalling gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Fetching gimp2 ---> Verifying checksum(s) for gimp2 ---> Extracting gimp2 ---> Configuring gimp2 ---> Building gimp2 with target all ---> Staging gimp2 into destroot ---> Packaging tgz archive for gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Installing gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Activating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Cleaning gimp2 ---> Deactivating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Uninstalling gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Fetching gimp2 ---> Verifying checksum(s) for gimp2 ---> Extracting gimp2 ---> Configuring gimp2 ---> Building gimp2 with target all -- Paul Beard contact info: www.paulbeard.org/paulbeard.vcf pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pdb206/ Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem?
On Mar 5, 2007, at 18:31, Paul Beard wrote:
I'm no expert but this looks strange to me:
---> Uninstalling gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Fetching gimp2 ---> Verifying checksum(s) for gimp2 ---> Extracting gimp2 ---> Configuring gimp2 ---> Building gimp2 with target all ---> Staging gimp2 into destroot ---> Packaging tgz archive for gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Installing gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Activating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Cleaning gimp2 ---> Deactivating gimp2 2.2.13_0 ---> Uninstalling gimp2 2.2.13_0 [snip more of the same]
Looks strange to me. What did you type to get that output?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 5, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Looks strange to me. What did you type to get that output?
port -f upgrade I think I may be using obsolete commands. - -- Paul Beard contact info: www.paulbeard.org/paulbeard.vcf pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pdb206/ Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF7PinfHLPwpj1/JQRAuNyAJsF76bdpm5pkUL6gQLoJwNc+FwFhwCcCuY2 YwL31qLMWgljkRl5hxvDRR0= =Qgon -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mar 6, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Paul Beard wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Looks strange to me. What did you type to get that output?
port -f upgrade
I think I may be using obsolete commands.
you are. What are you trying to do? -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- dluke@geeklair.net ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 6, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
What are you trying to do?
port -f upgrade um, upgrade a port? It looks like -u does what I want, but old habits die hard. - -- Paul Beard contact info: www.paulbeard.org/paulbeard.vcf pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pdb206/ Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF7brBfHLPwpj1/JQRAkpIAJ498fV/iGklp0UF3noZefJ8yFN7PwCfXkKT 8CdtSeLMxuNs+vgjCMQFdPU= =ynN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Daniel J. Luke
-
Paul Beard
-
Ryan Schmidt