Modifying ports depending on gsed wouldn't be that much work: % egrep -r '((bin|lib):[^:]|port):gsed' . | grep -v PortIndex | cut - f 1 -d : | xargs -t -n 1 grep gnused grep gnused ./devel/git-core/Portfile grep gnused ./devel/quilt/Portfile configure.args --with-sed=${prefix}/bin/gnused grep gnused ./print/teTeX/Portfile reinplace "s|sed -f|${prefix}/bin/gnused -f|g" $ {workpath}/${worksrcdir}/texk/make/man.mk reinplace "s|sed -n|${prefix}/bin/gnused -n|g" $ {workpath}/${worksrcdir}/texk/make/man.mk reinplace "s|sed -e|${prefix}/bin/gnused -e|g" $ {workpath}/${worksrcdir}/texk/make/man.mk Le 18 mai 07 à 23:33, Marius Schamschula a écrit :
Hi there,
Your point is well taken. When I first created the Portfile, we had an online discussion about this very issue. The, then DarwinPorts, powers that be chose the gnu prefix, rather than the g prefix as in gawk (OK this is not quite fair since GNU awk is always called gawk). Off hand, I don't know how many other ports depend on GNU sed, so changing then name at this point may not be a good idea.
On my machines I use GNU sed as sed...
On May 18, 2007, at 2:59 PM, N_Ox wrote:
Hello
Something has been bothering me for a moment: For consistency's sake, wouldn't be better to set --program- prefix=g in gnused? That's the program-prefix we can see in other GNU ports, e.g. {core,diff,find}utils.
Anyway, i've made some modifications to this port (mainly concerning nls support) and i will file a ticket about it soon.
N_Ox.
Marius -- Marius Schamschula, Alabama A & M University, Department of Physics
The Center for Hydrology Soil Climatology and Remote Sensing http://optics.physics.aamu.edu/ - http://www.physics.aamu.edu/ http://wx.aamu.edu/ - http://www.aamu.edu/hscars/
participants (1)
-
N_Ox