Re: Noob Installing MacPorts Problem
Please keep replies on the list by using the Reply To All feature of your email program when you reply. On Dec 4, 2007, at 20:22, Chris Share wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007, at 19:03, Chris Share wrote:
I'm new to MacPorts. I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.10. By mistake I downloaded and installed the Leopard version of MacPorts.
I've tried uninstalling MacPorts as described in the MacPorts FAQ however when I run the Tiger version of the installer it first asks me if I want to upgrade the installation and then seems to get stuck during the installation process. I suspect that some part of the Leopard installation has not been removed.
How can I fix this?
Follow the uninstall instructions in the FAQ, but also remove the MacPorts receipt in /Library/Receipts. Then try installing the Tiger version again. If it gets stuck again, tell us exactly where.
I've gone through the uninstall process again.
The only thing I can see in /Library/Receipts is
com.adobe.Reader
When I run the installer, I get to the Install step and then click the "Upgrade" button. The installer gets to the "Finishing Installation" step (about 90% of the way through the progress bar) however then it stops.
Sorry about that: I didn't mean the Receipts folder in the Library folder in your home folder (which on my system also contains only a folder called com.adobe.Reader); I mean the Receipts folder in the Library folder at the root of your hard drive (which should contain many many items, including something like MacPorts-1.5.0.pkg). I have updated the uninstall instructions so that they also remove the receipts, so please follow them again, then try installing MacPorts again. http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/wiki/ FAQ#HowdoIremoveoruninstallMacPorts The button in the Installer only reads "Upgrade" if a prior receipt is found, and reads "Install" otherwise. Dear developers: is there a good reason why the package is called "MacPorts-1.5.0.pkg"? Wouldn't "MacPorts.pkg" be better? Otherwise people installing subsequent versions will end up with multiple receipts...
participants (1)
-
Ryan Schmidt