The ruby 1.9.1 rake does work without any issues but I wasn't 100% sure because there's also a version of rake in

<PATH>/macruby-experimental/bin

-Conrad

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Laurent Sansonetti <lsansonetti@apple.com> wrote:
Hi,

Our Rakefile-based system has only been tested with /usr/bin/rake, the version that ships with Mac OS X and that uses Ruby 1.8.

I did not try with 1.9's rake (though it may perhaps work), and I am sure that it won't work with macruby's macrake (this explains your SEGV) for the moment.

HTH
Laurent


On Jul 5, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:

Hi, I was wondering, which version of rake should one use to build and run the specs/benchmarks with?  I ask this questions because my default points to

/opt/local/bin/rake

which is the version that's parts of my MacPorts install of Ruby 1.9.1p129.  Also, I noticed that there's a version called macrake which generates the following error on execution:

Segementation fault

-Conrad









_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel