Ah, indeed, there are subtle differences with lvars at the top-level in IRB vs in a method scope. Not sure if I'd consider this a bug or not, but to illustrate:

>> result = nil
=> nil
>> Dispatch::Queue.concurrent.sync do
>>   result = true
>> end
=> nil
>> result
=> true
>> def test
>>   result = nil
>>   Dispatch::Queue.concurrent.sync do
>>     result = true
>>   end
>>   result
>> end
=> nil
>> test
=> nil

Anyway, we're getting away from the original question. If you replace your lvars with ivars (s/result/@result/ above), then things will work. Just be careful of the possibility of concurrency bugs when assigning the same ivar from multiple queued blocks (and also have a look at the dispatch gem which has some convenience methods to make this sort of thing easier).

On Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Michael Johnston wrote:

Very strange, your example works for me in irb too. Irb must do something odd with locals. Have you tried this outside of irb, though? If you wrap with a method def'n in irb, it behaves differently, and the fact that locals are copied has been discussed lots on the list. But Laurent (I think) said this will likely change, has it already? I'm on 0.10



$ macirb --noprompt
def check
print "can I change a local scalar? "
maybe = "nope"
$q.sync do
maybe = "yep"
end
puts maybe
end
=> nil
def check_p
print "can I assign to a pointer? "
maybe_p = Pointer.new(:id)
maybe_p.assign "nope"
$q.sync do
maybe_p.assign "yep"
end
puts maybe_p[0]
end
=> nil
def check_w
print "can I assign to a wrapper attr? "
maybe = ResultWrapper.new("nope")
$q.sync do
maybe.value = "yep"
end
puts maybe.value
end
=> nil
ResultWrapper = Struct.new(:value)
=> ResultWrapper
$q= Dispatch::Queue.new('q')
=> q
check
can I change a local scalar? nope
=> nil
# but using a pointer works:
=> nil
check_p
can I assign to a pointer? yep
=> nil
# or a wrapper (but more expensive for tight loops):
=> nil
check_w
can I assign to a wrapper attr? yep
=> nil
$q= Dispatch::Queue.concurrent
=> com.apple.root.default-priority
# double-checking it isn't different for the parallel queues:
=> nil
check
can I change a local scalar? nope
=> nil
check_p
can I assign to a pointer? yep
=> nil
check_w
can I assign to a wrapper attr? yep
=> nil









Cheerio,

Michael Johnston
lastobelus@mac.com




On 2011-10-22, at 12:32 AM, Joshua Ballanco wrote:

On Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Michael Johnston wrote:
When I need to get a queue-protected result into a local in code that is concurrent (so I can't use an ivar) is a pointer the best (only) way to get the result of a sync block? Assuming I don't want to factor out a method object.


ex:

result_p = Pointer.new(:id)
some_queue.sync do
result_p.assign(value_protected_by_queue)
end
result = result_p[0]

it's not very ruby-ish...

There's no restriction on not using ivars in block. Indeed, even locals are in scope in a block (and with a #sync dispatched block such as the one you provided, there aren't even any threading issues):

result = nil
Dispatch::Queue.concurrent.sync do
result = true
end
p result #=> true
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel