Is the critical tag reserved for specs that cause an unrecoverable error in the interpreter, or can they also sometimes indicate priority? In other words, if a tag marked critical starts failing at the assertion/expectation level, rather than at the interpreter level, should that tag be changed to "fails"?

Mike

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Eloy Duran <eloy.de.enige@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes indeed, the ones that segfault should be tagged as critical.

To list all current critical tags:
$ ./mspec/bin/mspec tag --list critical -B ./spec/macruby.mspec :full 

Cheers,
Eloy


On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:

I think the plan is to tag these as "critical". At least that's what we have been doing for a while. Eloy might want to confirm this :-)

Laurent

On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Perry Smith wrote:

How do others feel about changing the tags on the tests that get segv faults to something like "faults".  At least with my system, the whole testing chain stops at the segv faults.

Thanks,
Perry

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel