On 2011-05-20, at 3:28 PM, Nat Brown wrote:

am i understanding the option being described here as manually forcing a pre-compile of .rb gems to .rbo cached to the gems directory (with caveats like no backtrace, ymmv)?

Almost. You lose backtraces right now, but that is a temporary tradeoff; eventually MacRuby will be able to give backtraces for pre-compiled code. Also, there is the auto_compile command in the plugin that automatically compiles gems as you install them.


anybody working on a generic (system-wide or per-user or configurable?) cache of arbitrary .rb -> .rbo similar to how rubyinline works, where llvm intermediaries being built are automatically cached and invalidated when the associated/underlying .rb changes?

i would be interested to help if somebody is already in-flight with that, or take a stab it if nobody is -- lmk pls.

That sounds interesting and potentially very useful, but not too difficult to do. Unfortunately I am already in the middle of too many different projects so I wouldn't be able to help much. :(


thx, n@


Good luck,

Mark Rada
mrada@marketcircle.com


On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Mark Rada <mrada@marketcircle.com> wrote:
Rspec 2.6 works on the macruby nightly builds.

Load times are partly due to rubygems being very slow on MacRuby and rspec being split into 4 gems (plus one other external gem).

The other problem is that you have to JIT all the code at run time; you should be able to cut the load time in half by compiling rspec and its dependencies, but that has a couple of caveats right now, you can read more about it in the README for my rubygems plugin:

       https://github.com/ferrous26/rubygems-compile

Also, there are a couple of issues in the macruby trac related to slow gem loading time. You may wish to add a comment there about rspec.


Mark Rada
mrada@marketcircle.com



On 2011-05-20, at 2:50 PM, Shannon Love wrote:

> Christian,
>
> Reverting to Rspec 2.5 allowed rspec to run under macruby (so far.) However, it is extremely slow compared to running under system ruby. it takes 10+ seconds to run just an empty test and pegs out one of my cores to do so.
>
> Macruby should run faster than the system ruby 1.8.7 so I think I've still got a Macruby problem somewhere. Guess I need to do another post.
>
> Thanks,
> Shannon
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel