#370: Inconsistency between macruby and ruby in a simple class -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: kfowler@… | Owner: lsansonetti@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: MacRuby 0.5 Component: MacRuby | Keywords: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by kfowler@…): if I change M to extend W: {{{class M < W}}}... then I get: {{{ ##-<W:0x2000166c0 @w=1> ##-<M:0x200016aa0 @m=1> ##-<M:0x200016e20 @m=1> ##-<M:0x200010980 @m=##-<W:0x2000109c0 @w=1>> }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/370#comment:1> MacRuby <http://macruby.org/>

#370: Inconsistency between macruby and ruby in a simple class -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: kfowler@… | Owner: lsansonetti@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: MacRuby 0.5 Component: MacRuby | Keywords: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by conradwt@…): Yes, there's seems to be an issue with the initialize method returning the instance to the caller. However, you can rewrite the classes as follows and the initialize method seems to work as expected: {{{ W = Class.new do define_method :initialize do |w| @w = w end end M = Class.new do define_method :initialize do |m| @m = m end end printf("%s\n" , W.new(W.new(1)).inspect) printf("%s\n" , M.new(M.new(1)).inspect) printf("%s\n" , W.new(M.new(1)).inspect) printf("%s\n" , M.new(W.new(1)).inspect) }}} Next, adding 'self' as the last executable statement within the 'initialize' method provides a temporary workaround. Finally, if I'm reading the code correctly, the function 'rb_class_new_instance0' within the 'object.c' file may be a starting point for resolving the issue. -- Ticket URL: <http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/370#comment:3> MacRuby <http://macruby.org/>

#370: Inconsistency between macruby and ruby in a simple class -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: kfowler@… | Owner: lsansonetti@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: MacRuby 0.5 Component: MacRuby | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Changes (by lsansonetti@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: After a quick investigation it looks like this code was not necessary anymore, I deleted it in r2775. -- Ticket URL: <http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/370#comment:5> MacRuby <http://macruby.org/>

#370: Inconsistency between macruby and ruby in a simple class -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: kfowler@… | Owner: lsansonetti@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: MacRuby 0.5 Component: MacRuby | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by lsansonetti@…): Indeed, there seems to be a problem in #inspect when the receiver has at least one instance variable: {{{ $ ./miniruby -e "class Foo; def initialize; @foo=42; end; end; p Foo.new.inspect" "##-<Foo:0x200025d20 @foo=42>" $ ruby19 -e "class Foo; def initialize; @foo=42; end; end; p Foo.new.inspect" "#<Foo:0x0000010086a3c0 @foo=42>" }}} Could you open a new ticket about this? -- Ticket URL: <http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/370#comment:7> MacRuby <http://macruby.org/>