[squirrelfish] Ever considered inlining 'hot' functions?

Hi all, I might be completely wrong, my understanding of our JIT or JIT in general might be flawed as well. I have been reading some papers on SELF93s type based optimizations and related papers and started to wonder.

From my understanding our JIT is generating code on the method level (a whole method), did you ever consider inlining small functions? E.g. where the number of bytecode is < 2 * the size of an activation record?

is that already done? was it tried? does it make sense? z.