On Dec 1, 2007, at 22:14, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
(I don't like reply-to munging.)
On 1 Dec 2007, at 19:41, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
3. We should probably refer to this package as "X11" (as opposed to X11User), because it includes parts of what would traditionally go into the SDK package (the man pages for functions, and the header files). That's perfectly fine; I see no reason to bother with splitting it into two packages.
Ok, I just noticed that the package was called X11User.pkg still in the Leopard install, so I wanted to keep that the same... I'll change it.
I don't think this is a good idea. The idea here is to overlay the system X11User.pkg, not install another separate component. This package should include only what would go into X11User.pkg, not the headers.
AFAICT, with Leopard, binaries are installed from com.apple.pkg.X11User (main install) and headers are from com.apple.pkg.X11SDKLeo (XCode 3). I *really* don't want to maintain two separate packages, and I don't feel right calling our package com.apple.*. It's a community supported overlay of Apple's official releases, so I'm just going to use org.x.X11 and combine both X11User and X11SDK updates. Does anyone have any objections to that or know of any negative consequences to doing that?