[CalendarServer-dev] Re: [CalendarServer-changes] [1187] CalendarServer/trunk/twistedcaldav/directory/ appleopendirectory.py

[Wilfredo Sánchez Vega]

   The principal URI should be done by the DAV resource, I think,  
because the directory service doesn't get to decide whether we use  
those or not.

   Same, I think for urn:uuid:GUID, since guids are required for all  
records and we should always accept those addresses, rather than  
leaving that up to the service.

   The directory service should get to extend the address list based  
on whatever additional information it can obtain.  mailto:EMAIL would  
be an example of that.

	-wsv


On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:

> Hi Wilfredo,
>
> --On February 15, 2007 12:54:47 PM -0800 Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez at wsanchez.net 
> > wrote:
>
>>    Or it may simply be best to ignore the templates in OD  
>> altogether and
>> simply populate all of the available address forms.
>
> That would be fine by me, but I would still like to have that done  
> by the directory service (the parent class) rather than hard-coding  
> at the point of property lookup.
>
> So we want the server to support for calendar user addresses:
>
> relative principal URI
> absolute principal URI (http/https depending on which is running)
> email address
> urn:uuid
>
> -- 
> Cyrus Daboo
>