<div dir="ltr">Would 1.x , 3.x and 5.x be applied on attendee replies as well or do those only apply on organizes' proper?ty</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Gaurav Jain <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:monkeyfdude@gmail.com" target="_blank">monkeyfdude@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I need a clarification for RFC 6638</div><div><br></div><div>4.2. Processing "Attendee" Replies<br></div><div><br></div><div>...</div><div><br></div><div><div>The server MUST also update or add the "SCHEDULE-STATUS" property</div><div> parameter on each matching "ATTENDEE" iCalendar property and set its</div><div> value to that of the "REQUEST-STATUS" property in the reply, or to</div><div><b> "2.0" if "REQUEST-STATUS" is not present (also taking into account</b></div><div> recurrence instances). If there are multiple "REQUEST-STATUS"</div><div> properties in the reply, the "SCHEDULE-STATUS" property parameter</div><div> value is set to a comma-separated list of status codes, one from each</div><div> "REQUEST-STATUS" property.</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>However, 3.2.9. Schedule Status Values does not contain 2.0 as one of the value?</div><div><br></div><div>It only contains 1.x, 3.x and 5.x</div><div><br></div><div>why schedule status value table does not contain 2.0?<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best Regards,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>