[launchd-dev] CMF vs LaunchD
Dave Zarzycki
zarzycki at apple.com
Sun Sep 16 10:53:16 PDT 2007
I wish not to respond to the anonymous comment directly.
If you have any questions of your own, I would be happy to answer them.
On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Nehemiah Dacres wrote:
> some one critiqes your talk on launchd in favor of Solarus's CMF,
> any comments?
> http://www.macgeekery.com/launchd_video#comments
>
> the comment is
> "The whole presentation was significantly longer and more verbose
> than it needs to be.
> I found two things interesting: – for all the talk about making
> things easy to use, setting up launchd jobs without the use of a
> third-party app like Lingon is harder than it needs to be – many of
> the shortcomings of launchd are already addressed by Solaris' SMF,
> e.g. dependency tracking between services, or monitoring all the
> subprocesses so that if a service is restarted, you don't have left-
> over orphaned child processes of the old service instance to get in
> your way"
>
> posted as anon. i agree with your not wanting to allow the
> user(admin) to fork and forget as your say but what about his other
> claim. any reply?
> --
>
> "lalalalala! it's not broken because I can use it"
>
> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=194281&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=15927703
> _______________________________________________
> launchd-dev mailing list
> launchd-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/launchd-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/launchd-dev/attachments/20070916/9f584659/attachment.html
More information about the launchd-dev
mailing list