[launchd-dev] LaunchD crashing daemon in 10.5

Hamish Allan hamish at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 16:21:12 PST 2008


On Feb 9, 2008 12:07 AM, Carl Smith <Carl.Smith at kaseya.com> wrote:

> And why would 10.5 be throwing a SIGTERM and 10.4 not throwing one?

I'm not sure, but there have been many enhancements to launchd between
10.4 and 10.5. SIGTERM is the appropriate signal for asking a POSIX
process to terminate gracefully -- indeed, how did the daemon ever
manage to exit gracefully under 10.4? Also, why does the rest of your
installation procedure fail when your daemon exits abruptly?

Hamish


More information about the launchd-dev mailing list