On 11/18/2009 04:50 PM, Mario Schwalbe wrote: > I thought this is what LT_LIB_M does already, as it adds -lm or -lmw to > LIBM on systems that require it. This variable in turn can be used just > with the binary that requires it. What's the difference? FWIW, I agree that LT_LIB_M is a good choice. Paolo