[libdispatch-dev] [PATCH 2/4] check whether to add -lm for testing to compile
Paolo Bonzini
bonzini at gnu.org
Wed Nov 18 08:53:02 PST 2009
On 11/18/2009 05:20 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Has anyone else noticed that getting libdispatch to run on a new OS is
> the easy bit, and that figuring out the auto*/libtool/pkg-config/etc
> stuff is the hard bit? :-)
Uhm, I disagree. The libtool and pkg-config bits required a bit of
learning curve for some people, and next time they would have quite a
headstart. Mark has been great in incorporating pkg-config and libtool
into libkqueue for example!
And the autoconf parts (including libm and the like) are _intrinsically_
part of getting libdispatch to run on a new OS. It would be worse
without autoconf, though autoconf is no global optimum (there is none),
and it's definitely worth it.
Hopefully, we're just a couple of patches away from running a
libkqueue-based libdispatch on Linux, and of the last 40-50 patches
definitely not all of them were configury fixes. In fact, I wouldn't
underestimate _your_ work in getting libdispatch to run a non-BSD
systems. For example the conversion of the testsuite to automake was
very helpful.
Just my 2 cents on "Autoconf is hard, let's go shopping" :-)
Paolo
More information about the libdispatch-dev
mailing list