[libdispatch-dev] [PATCH 05/17] more precise detection of blocks

Robert Watson robert at fledge.watson.org
Wed Oct 28 01:48:30 PDT 2009

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

> I now make the test a bit more precise; for some reason my first LLVM
> installation had blocks but no Blocks.h and Blocks_private.h.  After
> adding this check, using __BLOCKS__ is not sufficient anymore hence
> I changed it all over the place to an autoconfy HAVE_BLOCKS symbol.

Per earlier discussion, it's not yet clear this is the right solution (or 
right problem), so I've not merged this patch from your series, for the time 
being.  I'll move onto the ones that follow it, avoiding conflicts where 


More information about the libdispatch-dev mailing list