[libdispatch-dev] trivial linux patch + general questions

[Mark Heily]

On 04/16/2011 11:34 AM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
> Can someone apply this if it's a proper fix ------------- diff --git
> a/autogen.sh b/autogen.sh
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> diff --git a/testing/Makefile.am b/testing/Makefile.am
> index 404ced0..103d8bf 100644
> --- a/testing/Makefile.am
> +++ b/testing/Makefile.am
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ TOOLS= \
> noinst_PROGRAMS+=$(TOOLS)
>
> INCLUDES=-I$(top_builddir) -I$(top_srcdir)
> -LDADD=libtest.la ../src/libdispatch.la
> +LDADD=libtest.la ../src/libdispatch.la ../src/libshims.la
> CFLAGS=-Wall $(MARCH_FLAGS) $(CBLOCKS_FLAGS)
> CXXFLAGS=-Wall $(MARCH_FLAGS) $(CXXBLOCKS_FLAGS) ---------

Hi,

Can you provide more details about the compilation problem you are seeing, 
and give a little information about your Linux distribution and the versions 
of Automake/Autoconf/Libtool? According to src/Makefile.am:

	libdispatch_la_DEPENDENCIES=libshims.la

This has been sufficient to get the unit tests to build on Debian and 
Fedora. If I had to guess, I would say your libtool isn't adding the 
dependency on libshims.la.

> I also get a
> test failure with make check --------- LOW: 68
> ******************************************* DEFAULT: 63
> **************************************** HIGH: 61
> *************************************** Actual: 192 Expected: 192 [PASS]
> blocks completed Actual: 68 Expected: <61 [FAIL] high priority
> precedence (../../testing/dispatch_priority.c:83)
> ../../testing/dispatch_priority.c:83 PASS: dispatch_priority
> ================================================== [TEST] Dispatch
> Priority (Set Target Queue) [PID] 541
> ================================================== --------- Is this an
> out of sync test case or a legitimate failure?

Are you using the HEAD of libkqueue from Subversion? This looks like a 
regression that was recently introduced. Please try again with the libkqueue 
v1.0.2 tarball.

Regards,

  - Mark