PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> Last time this was brought up only one person complained,

?? Every few months this comes up. There are a few people vocally in  
favor of one way or another to do things. I think most people don't  
care too much.

> but it really is a serious problem and we need standards.

??

> Therefore I propose the following:

[snip]

My counter proposal is as follows:

Whitespace rules inside of Portfiles are the maintainer's  
prerogative. Portfile authors should be consistent with their  
application of whitespace.

When working on base/ code, the author should conform to the existing  
whitespace conventions of the code he/she is working on.

These are the current, repeatedly agreed to, standards anyway.
--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20070907/bdd90a98/PGP.bin