[61506] trunk/dports/www/webdot/Portfile

[Joshua Root]

On 2009-12-14 00:14 , ryandesign at macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 61506
>           http://trac.macports.org/changeset/61506
> Author:   ryandesign at macports.org
> Date:     2009-12-13 05:14:03 -0800 (Sun, 13 Dec 2009)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> webdot: fix ui_msg to match MacPorts 1.8's command line flags
> 
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>     trunk/dports/www/webdot/Portfile
> 
> Modified: trunk/dports/www/webdot/Portfile
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/dports/www/webdot/Portfile	2009-12-13 13:13:11 UTC (rev 61505)
> +++ trunk/dports/www/webdot/Portfile	2009-12-13 13:14:03 UTC (rev 61506)
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>          }
>          ui_msg "${name} requires that ${graphviz_port} first be installed with the +tcl variant."
>          ui_msg "Rebuild ${graphviz_port} using:"
> -        ui_msg "    sudo port -nf upgrade ${graphviz_port} +tcl"
> +        ui_msg "    sudo port -n upgrade --force ${graphviz_port} +tcl"
>          return -code error "${graphviz_port} missing +tcl variant"
>      }
>  }

What if tcl is not installed when the user runs this command? Wouldn't
this be more appropriate?

Index: Portfile
===================================================================
--- Portfile	(revision 61513)
+++ Portfile	(working copy)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
         }
         ui_msg "${name} requires that ${graphviz_port} first be
installed with the +tcl variant."
         ui_msg "Rebuild ${graphviz_port} using:"
-        ui_msg "    sudo port -n upgrade --force ${graphviz_port} +tcl"
+        ui_msg "    sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants
${graphviz_port} +tcl"
         return -code error "${graphviz_port} missing +tcl variant"
     }
 }

- Josh