[MacPorts] #22993: new port for dovecot-sieve

Bradley Giesbrecht brad at pixilla.com
Fri Jan 29 00:08:26 PST 2010


I just uploaded a new diff. This is a diff from the current macports  
Portfile and only required a version number and checksum change.

I'm running on my production server now and mail seems to be flowing  
normally. I was already at 1.2.9 so this was a minor upgrade. Others  
may have to change some configs to go from 1.1.6 to 1.2.x. I had to  
make some changes to my system when I made the upgrade a while back.

// Brad

On Jan 27, 2010, at 11:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 22:41, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
>> On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:06 PM, MacPorts wrote:
>>
>>> #22993: new port for dovecot-sieve
>>> ------------------------------ 
>>> +---------------------------------------------
>>> Reporter:  brad@…            |       Owner:  macports-tickets@…
>>>   Type:  submission        |      Status:  new
>>> Priority:  Normal            |   Milestone:
>>> Component:  ports             |     Version:
>>> Keywords:                    |        Port:  dovecot dovecot-sieve
>>> ------------------------------ 
>>> +---------------------------------------------
>>> Changes (by ryandesign@…):
>>>
>>> * cc: ryandesign@… (added)
>>>
>>>
>>> Comment:
>>>
>>> The attached patch to update dovecot contains tons of  
>>> irrelevancies. Could
>>> you or someone try again, submitting a diff that makes only the  
>>> relevant
>>> changes to update to the latest version? Note that I've made many  
>>> changes
>>> to dovecot today, and that 1.2.10 is now the latest version  
>>> available.
>>
>>
>> Since Ryan already updated dovecot to 1.2.10 there is no need, right?
>
> I have not updated dovecot to 1.2.10 yet.
>
>
>> As for the dovecot-sieve portfile I don't know how to do it any  
>> better.
>
> I haven't even begun to look at your dovecot-sieve portfile yet; I  
> was just interested in getting dovecot updated to 1.2.10. I was  
> referring to irrelevancies in the patch that was supplied in this  
> ticket to perform that update:
>
> http://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/22993/patch-Portfile
>
> For example, it changes the Id line, it changes the branch variable  
> name to major_version, it introduces a typo in the long_description,  
> it adds an unnecessary distname directive, it changes pkgconfig from  
> a build to a library dependency, it adds Darwin 7 blocks when  
> MacPorts now requires Darwin 8 or newer, it changes the formatting  
> of the rawlog and ldap variants.... Why were all these changes made  
> and what do they have with updating the port to 1.2.10?
>
>



More information about the macports-dev mailing list