[MacPorts] #43261: py27-gobject3: No package 'pycairo' found

[Frank Schima]

Hello Ryan,


Thanks for dealing with this! I did a quick search and I see 4 ports, including py-gobject3, with that issue. Shall I open a ticket about about it?

$ pwd
/opt/mports/trunk/dports/python
$ grep PKG_CONFIG_PATH */Portfile
py-gobject/Portfile:    configure.env-append    PKG_CONFIG_PATH='${python.prefix}/lib/pkgconfig'
py-gobject3/Portfile:    configure.env-append    PKG_CONFIG_PATH='${python.prefix}/lib/pkgconfig'
py-matplotlib/Portfile:    build.env           PKG_CONFIG_PATH="${python.prefix}/lib/pkgconfig"
py26-mapnik/Portfile:    configure.args-append  PKG_CONFIG_PATH=${prefix}/lib/pkgconfig:${prefix}/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/pkgconfig/

Is the fix for all of these as simple as r120178 [1] like cal made?


Cheers!
Frank

[1] <https://trac.macports.org/changeset/120178>

On May 18, 2014, at 7:31 AM, MacPorts <noreply at macports.org> wrote:

> #43261: py27-gobject3: No package 'pycairo' found
> ---------------------------+----------------------
>  Reporter:  ryandesign@…  |      Owner:  cal@…
>      Type:  defect        |     Status:  reopened
>  Priority:  Normal        |  Milestone:
> Component:  ports         |    Version:  2.2.1
> Resolution:                |   Keywords:
>      Port:  py-gobject3   |
> ---------------------------+----------------------
> Changes (by ryandesign@…):
> 
> * status:  closed => reopened
> * keywords:  lack-of-interest =>
> * resolution:  worksforme =>
> 
> 
> Comment:
> 
> Ah, I had a local patch to the python-1.0 portgroup trying to solve the
> problem I mentioned in comment:ticket:34271:12. I've been running with
> that patch for a long time. I should just commit it.
> 
> The reason why py-gobject3 has a problem with the patch is that py-
> gobject3 puts PKG_CONFIG_PATH into configure.env manually, instead of
> using the configure.pkg_config_path variable. Looks like a number of ports
> make this same mistake. However, after I commit my patch to the portgroup,
> the ports will no longer need to add that path manually since the
> portgroup will already have done it.
> 
> -- 
> Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43261#comment:3>
> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
> Ports system for OS X
> _______________________________________________
> macports-tickets mailing list
> macports-tickets at lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-tickets

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20140518/ed188efd/attachment.html>