[147088] trunk/dports

[Takeshi Enomoto]

Ryan,

> Was this change made inadvertently? It does not appear to relate to revbumping ports that depend on netcdf.

I tried to move any changes unrelated to netcdf away,
but I must have left this.

> If this is a change you want made, the port's revision should be increased, since it changes the files the port installs.

The commit with netcdf rev bumps was a mistake but I believe it is worthwhile to instal this header so I will increase the revision.

Regards,

Takeshi

-----
Takeshi Enomoto
takeshi at macports.org