<div dir="ltr">What about using the libcxx and libcxxabi ports for libc++? Is there any way to make that work?<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Clemens Lang <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cal@macports.org" target="_blank">cal@macports.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:00:25PM +0000, Christopher Jones wrote:<br>
> Is this really a good idea though. My recollection is, whilst not as<br>
> bad as mixing libc++ and libstdc++ runtimes, mixing the two different<br>
> libstd++ runtimes can still lead to problems…. ?<br>
<br>
</div>Under the constraints we have I think its the best solution possible.<br>
Alternatives would be<br>
<br>
- Mark the port as broken on systems < darwin13 :(<br>
- Build a private copy of all dependencies of rethinkdb against<br>
macports libstdc++. Since that includes boost and a couple of other<br>
rather large ports, I don't think this is a feasible solution either.<br>
- Get Apple to ship a version of libstdc++ that supports C++11 on<br>
outdated OS releases<br>
- Get Apple to make libc++ the default stdlib on all releases that have<br>
libc++<br>
<br>
None of those sound very appealing to me.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
Clemens Lang<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
macports-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org">macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>