<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:51 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:MK-MacPorts@techno.ms" target="_blank">MK-MacPorts@techno.ms</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 13 Apr 2014, at 17:46 , Brandon Allbery <<a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com">allbery.b@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Looks like it's because it's a build dependency --- so, while the gtk2 port is what pulled it in, it is not needed at runtime.<br>
</div>Ahhh, I see.<br>
Thanks for solving this mystery! :-)</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, this is still highlighting an inconsistency. In this case, I think it's between the actual record of dependencies in the package registry (produced by actually installing something) and the pre-recorded list of dependencies in the package index (usually downloaded along with the port tree)? That, or rdeps just ignores anything that isn't a runtime dependency.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div>
<div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div>
</div></div>