<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/18/14 11:24 AM, Brandon Allbery
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKFCL4W5-RuM6GrvGjhWgBmbnbonjgTyTjai-UNF9Rn3x5SjYw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:16 PM,
Thomas Lockhart <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:tlockhart1976@gmail.com" target="_blank">tlockhart1976@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":2cp" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">btw,
the SUMO developers recommend using the head of the repo
for all work with SUMO, so they have some confidence
that this sumo-devel port would be a reasonable choice
when using SUMO.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
The notion of repeatable builds means we only work from tags,
not HEAD. (Of course, the notion of repeatable builds seems to
go over some developers' heads, since apparently maintaining
actual installs is not their problem --- what, everyone
doesn't simply rewrite entire application stacks when
$component gets updated in an incompatible way?!)<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I thought that might be the case. I would then recommend that
sumo-devel be retired, since having it be ancient does not seem
helpful and taking on frequent (daily?) updates seems like too much
work for everyone.<br>
<br>
If someone wants the freshest (and most mutable) code, build from
source.<br>
<br>
- Tom<br>
</body>
</html>