<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:52 AM, René J.V. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjvbertin@gmail.com" target="_blank">rjvbertin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tuesday February 10 2015 09:37:53 Brandon Allbery wrote:<br>
>I think someone did have this (try to) happen to them recently-ish. I also<br>
<br></span>I don't recall having seen this recently-ish issue discussed on a ML - or it was about a port that I found no interest in.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It was mentioned in IRC. Not all MacPorts discussion happens on mailing lists.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">>> I take it there is no official way to define the permissions mask for a<br>
>> macports user that would allow an admin user full control over content<br>
>> owned by the macports user (but not the reverse)?<br>><br>
>Not sure you can make extended ACLs propagate the right way.<br>
<br>
</span>IIRC you'd have to use umask() somewhere in a tcl extension, and then also unpack source </blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'd be trying to use ACLs for this, not rely on solely traditional Unix permissions.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div></div>
</div></div>