<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, René J.V. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjvbertin@gmail.com" target="_blank">rjvbertin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">So to you it's OK if a port fails to build because it pulls in things from an earlier, installed version of itself that were not blocked because the feature was not enabled, and do so without as much as an explanation?</blockquote></div><br>Port bugs are never OK. A diagnostic/debugging mode that is forced on in some port as a hackaround for port bugs instead of fixing the port is *also* never OK.<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div></div>
</div></div>