[MacPorts] #43917: ROOT6 : Update to first production release, 6.00.00

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Fri Jun 6 07:26:20 PDT 2014


#43917: ROOT6 : Update to first production release, 6.00.00
-----------------------+---------------------------------
  Reporter:  jonesc@…  |      Owner:  mojca@…
      Type:  update    |     Status:  new
  Priority:  Normal    |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports     |    Version:
Resolution:            |   Keywords:  haspatch maintainer
      Port:  root6     |
-----------------------+---------------------------------

Comment (by mojca@…):

 Replying to [comment:49 jonesc@…]:
 > Replying to [comment:48 mojca@…]:
 > > Yes, I changed it. Because from what I uderstand `[info exists
 configure.cxx_stdlib]` is always true since MacPorts 2.3.
 >
 > But is it then correct to *always* require /usr/lib/libc++.dylib is
 present, which is what it now does ?
 >
 > I thought the idea of using the libc++ port was to use that as an
 alternative when it was not available ? Or does that port actually provide
 this library ?

 I guess you are right. All that the `libcxx` port provides on my system is
 a `README` file with
 {{{
 libcxx is an empty port on this OS version because the functionality is
 already provided by the OS.
 }}}

 I'll remove the part with `pre-fetch` and see what happens on 10.6.

 > If also black listing macports clang 3.3 means 3.4 is then used, is this
 not a solution, or does it lead to other problems ?

 It shouldn't lead to other problems. And I plan to do just that (on the
 other hand it seems a bit unfair to blacklist 3.3 as that compiler works
 in principle, it's just that 3.4 should probably be the preferred one).

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43917#comment:52>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list