[MacPorts] #43700: freetds: Move back to stable version (was: Move back freetds to stableversion)
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Tue May 13 11:30:11 PDT 2014
#43700: freetds: Move back to stable version
------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: stronk7@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: freetds |
------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by ryandesign@…):
* port: => freetds
Old description:
> With https://trac.macports.org/changeset/99639 the freetds port was moved
> to 0.92.405
>
> 0.92 is a development version and 405 is already 1.5y old.
>
> More yet, it has some important issues handling LOBs and restrictions
> about logging/debugging, that seem to be enabled by default, conflicting
> with any attempt to disable it @ freetds.conf. Also a lot of issues have
> been fixed since 405 till today, many of them backported to 0.91.
>
> So this is a request to move back to 0.91 (stable version) point 103.
>
> I've switched here, using it from MSSQL, and it really seems to be
> quicker and more stable.
>
> For your consideration. The change is trivial. The only point is that it
> implies a "downgrade" (version.wise).
>
> Ciao :-)
New description:
With r99639 the freetds port was moved to 0.92.405
0.92 is a development version and 405 is already 1.5y old.
More yet, it has some important issues handling LOBs and restrictions
about logging/debugging, that seem to be enabled by default, conflicting
with any attempt to disable it @ freetds.conf. Also a lot of issues have
been fixed since 405 till today, many of them backported to 0.91.
So this is a request to move back to 0.91 (stable version) point 103.
I've switched here, using it from MSSQL, and it really seems to be quicker
and more stable.
For your consideration. The change is trivial. The only point is that it
implies a "downgrade" (version.wise).
Ciao :-)
--
Comment:
Thanks for letting us know. I didn't know 0.92.x wasn't stable. 0.92.402
is the "largest" version number in the
[ftp://ftp.freetds.org/pub/freetds/stable/ stable downloads directory] so
if it's not actually stable then that's confusing.
If 0.92.x is not stable, then we can go back to 0.91.x, but doing so will
require that the port's epoch gets increased. I'm also not sure yet how
we'll construct a working livecheck for this situation.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43700#comment:2>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list