ktimetracker and akonadi's googlecontacts/googlecalendar
"René J.V. Bertin"
rjvbertin at gmail.com
Wed Jun 4 08:02:34 PDT 2014
On Jun 04, 2014, at 14:53, Nicolas Pavillon wrote:
> I had a quick look at the Portfile, and apart some small things which could be simplified, it seems fine to me. One thing missing though are the maintainers. Should I put you, René, as you proposed it, or should I take it as an additional dependency of KDE, or put both ? In case I take it, I would be tempted to put things in the same format as other KDE ports for convenience.
I didn't put a maintainer as I'm not particularly interested in that duty, for this port; I see it more as an additional KDE dependency. So please, do as you see fit.
>
> Kdepim4-runtime will anyway be revbumped if the dependency is added, but on a side note, it should not provide built binaries due to license conflicts.
Yeah, I notice that the google resources are LGPL3+ - Apple's allergy to that version begins to make me wonder if the project couldn't find a couple of "neutral" servers just to distribute those "tainted" ports (hint: there's already a network of mirrors ;))
Alternatively, maybe you can do the same as with kioslaves, lump the tainted components together in a port that would allow the "clean" majority to be distributed in binary form?
Cheers,
René.
More information about the macports-users
mailing list