openssl vs. libressl

[woods.w at gmail.com]

But in this case, I don’t see one, openssl has been fine being distributed the way it is, its just that some people want a new-shiny here. 

> On Nov 11, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:00 PM, <woods.w at gmail.com <mailto:woods.w at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I agree, but “better license” has nothing to do with that, does it ?
> 
> It is the license that blocks binary distribution, with specific exemptions. Oddly enough, licenses are not merely political noise; they actually have practical ramifications that need to be considered.
> 
> -- 
> brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
> allbery.b at gmail.com <mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com>                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net <mailto:ballbery at sinenomine.net>
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net <http://sinenomine.net/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20151111/059e1375/attachment.html>