<div dir="ltr">It just feels more Mac-native. Also it has a shorter dependency chain in that it does not drag in gtk, nor does it require that gtk be installed with the `+x11` variant. <div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ryandesign@macports.org" target="_blank">ryandesign@macports.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On Jan 15, 2014, at 19:57, Eric Gallager wrote:<br>
<div class="im">> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:<br>
>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for py-wxpython-2.8…<br>
>><br>
>> Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If so please explain.<br>
><br>
</div><div class="im">> No, just that I prefer it and currently use it... I could probably do without it though.<br>
<br>
</div>Why do you prefer it? In what way is the carbon variant different from the gtk variant?<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>