<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:07 PM, "René J.V. Bertin" <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjvbertin@gmail.com" target="_blank">rjvbertin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Jun 04, 2014, at 20:51, Eric Gallager wrote:<br>
<br>
> Isn't 236.3_1 the broken one that failed to build? How did you manage to get it installed in the first place?<br>
<br>
</div>I had an exchange (on here or via the bug tracker) and had even prepared my own patched portfile that version-locked to 136 on 10.6, but Jeremy pushed a patch very quickly that allowed v. 236 to build (with a minor version bump IIRC). I think there was even a binary build of it.<br>
I didn't keep trace of what I did since the issue was resolved "upstream" ... now I regret.<br>
<br>
Not that I have the slightest idea what we're missing out on, but newer should be better, right? :)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
René<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Not necessarily, often times newer just means "newer" or "removed old stuff"...</div></div>