<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 5:16 PM, "René J.V. Bertin" <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjvbertin@gmail.com" target="_blank">rjvbertin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="">
On Jul 06, 2014, at 21:31, Brandon Allbery wrote:<br>
<br>
> public forums), but given that Debian distributes git and they're usually pretty good at being a stickler for license terms, I would expect the exemption exists and we just have to confirm it and add it to the Portfile.<br>
<br>
</div>I suppose Canonical wouldn't really be distributing illegal packages?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I do not always understand the reasoning Canonical applies. But they use Debian as their upstream, so in this case that's where the policy comes from.</div>
</div><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div>
<div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div>
</div></div>