<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ryandesign@macports.org" target="_blank">ryandesign@macports.org</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="">
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:05 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:<br>
<br>
> In fact, is there a way to get those installed manually, should `port` not pick them up for whatever reason? For ports that take as long to build as gcc or libgcc, replacing the build time with a bit of terminal exercise is still an immense gain of time.<br>
<br>
</div>There are several reasons why MacPorts would not attempt to download a binary:<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So, for what it's worth, just did a selfupdate and upgrade outated.</div><div><br></div><div>It built libgcc from source, without even checking for an archive. I do not force source builds or use nonstandard prefixes, and in fact I do get many things from archives. This makes me think license or etc. may be incorrect, or at least suboptimal.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div>
<div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div>
</div></div>