<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:53 PM, James Linder <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jam@tigger.ws" target="_blank">jam@tigger.ws</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":3u6" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">Could you wax lyrical for a moment on how you did a VM. Mail me off list if the answer is politically incorrect for the list.<br></div></blockquote></div><br>My understanding is that it's painful to (near?) impossible for VirtualBox, largely due to crashing bugs in the VMM, but Parallels and VMware Fusion support it. Parallels even has a sort of canned recipe for it, which I've used in the past. I will note that OS X has lots of visual glitches and the occasional crash when virtualized.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">It is entirely legal to run OS X Lion and later in a VM; IIRC the per-machine OS X license allows one VM for Lion and three for ML and Mavericks. Older OS X Server may also be virtualized (the relaxation of the client virtualization restriction is because OS X Server stopped being a separate product with Lion, as I understand it), which with one of the pay levels of the OS X Developer program can be fairly convenient.<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div>
</div></div>