<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:53 AM, René J.V. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjvbertin@gmail.com" target="_blank">rjvbertin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">>The simple reason to why Linux does it one way and OS X another, however,<br>
>is that on Linux X11 is primary and gets "naming rights". on OS X, it is an<br>
>interloper and does not get to choose for itself how the system it's on<br>
>works or what system names it's allowed to use.<br>
<br>
</span>And that, my dear, is a pristine example of the same kind of OS arrogance that bites us when getting FOSS to work properly on OS X.</blockquote></div><br>This comment only makes sense if you consider Linux privileged and OS X the interloper, which is indeed a good example of OS arrogance.<br><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div>
</div></div>